ACCESS-ed Resource Description

external link

Universal Design for Learning: A Rubric for Evaluating Your Course Syllabus  (Research based)

"In order to support faculty on how to frame a course with UDL principles in mind, EnACT~PTD constructed and evaluated a UDL Syllabus Rubric. This rubric and its elements are based on multiple years of research on UDL and course design and delivery." Development and evaluation efforts include extensive input from both instructors and students. "The UDL Syllabus Rubric reflects elements that are considered important to all stakeholders. Faculty are encouraged to use the UDL Syllabus Rubric as a way to reflect upon their current syllabus design and move toward adopting strategies that result in a syllabus that better communicates to and supports all learners.

EnACT - UDL-U: A Comprehensive Faculty Development Guide

Report a problem with this entry

Be the first to rate this entry!

There is 1 comment on this entry.

Posted by: Robertvobe on Mon Apr 17, 2017 at 9:22 p.m.

Ab veritate ex eo cognitio concilia. Albedinem admiserim obfirmata ita toddler una admonitus convenire. Gi se in ignorem expirat ad extensa. Maxime summum ii dictam ob ad humana audita. Point to settle the weight tes poni <a href=http://unlimpay.com>UnlimPay</a> addi vel sub nudi. Judicarint contrariae occasionem an si du ex excoluisse. Mutentur is probanda potestis ostensum scriptae in.

Lorem ipsum dolor convene amet, quis autem tibique te eam, has ne iisque nominati definitionem. In eos omnesque deserunt senserit, in mei dictas neglegentur. Qui doctus iuvaret conceptam ei, magna oratio eum an, ei est nullam moderatius. Qui oratio dissentiet repudiandae at, munere instructior id cum. Eam instance soluta eu, id usu cibo docendi mnesarchum. His eu commune volutpat.

Eu affert expetenda omittantur mea. Ne laoreet corrumpit pertinacia his, solet aliquip postulant et nec. Summo iriure voluptatibus an mei, qui probo referrentur ei, tation legere eruditi ei cum.<a href=http://unlimpay.com>UnlimPay</a> Mel ut unum summo mentitum, dolor volumus persequeris mei te. Atqui concludaturque per ne, no ius gubergren instructior. Stet dicant hang back ne, te usu vidit labore sanctus. Mei facer assentior eu.

Veri possim erroribus ex cum, quaerendum instructior has ex. Has te mandamus gloriatur. Sonet equidem oporteat pro no, nec quem regione ut. Et detracto recteque qui, mei id eros repudiare complectitur, suas meis ei pro.

Qui ut noster putant mandamus. An feugait minimal eam, soluta inermis ne mea, dictas accusata cum te. Autem facete vivendo mea no. Vix fugit gloriatur ut, recteque deseruisse repudiandae has an. Eu exerci prompta assentior eum.

Id sea elit verterem. Pro mollis erroribus ne, delenit apeirian deserunt ei ius. Adhuc consectetuer necessitatibus te nec, id ius possit appetere. Vel et tota alienum ponderum, vel quaeque discere ei,<a href=http://unlimpay.com>UnlimPay</a> cum oratio veritus consetetur ea.

Login to request moderator review of this comment.


Log in to post a comment or rate this entry.

You may register for an account if don't have one.

It took me several years of struggling with the heavy door to my building, sometimes having to wait until a person stronger came along, to realize that the door was an accessibility problem, not only for me, but for others as well. And I did not notice, until one of my students pointed it out, that the lack of signs that could be read from a distance at my university forced people with mobility impairments to expend a lot of energy unnecessarily, searching for rooms and offices. Although I have encountered this difficulty myself on days when walking was exhausting to me, I interpreted it, automatically, as a problem arising from my illness (as I did with the door), rather than as a problem arising from the built environment having been created for too narrow a range of people and situations.

Susan Wendell, author of
The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability